Logo-jrip
Submitted: 02 Jul 2020
Accepted: 05 Oct 2020
ePublished: 29 Oct 2020
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Renal Inj Prev. 2021;10(4): e31.
doi: 10.34172/jrip.2021.31

Scopus ID: 85115617366
  Abstract View: 1624
  PDF Download: 940

Original

Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of home blood pressure monitoring by patients

Sepideh Hajian 1 ORCID logo, Nafiseh Rastgoo 2* ORCID logo, Sanaz Jamshidi 3 ORCID logo

1 Department of Nephrology, Velayat Hospital, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
2 Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
3 Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding author: Nafiseh Rastgoo, Email: , Email: nafis.rastgoo.20@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: According to available guidelines, home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) can be used to diagnose hypertension and monitor its treatment; however, its effectiveness has rarely been studied in developing countries, including Iran.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HBPM, as compared with that of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and office blood pressure measurement (OBPM).

Patients and Methods: This study was conducted on 28 patients suspected of having primary hypertension. The blood pressure of the patients was measured by four methods. Initially, blood pressure was measured by a non-physician using a digital sphygmomanometer in a clinic (OBPM-Digital). After about 1 hour, blood pressure was measured by a physician at the clinic using a mercury sphygmomanometer (OBPM-Mercury). In the third stage, the patient’s blood pressure was monitored for 24 hours by the ABPM method. In the fourth stage, each subject used a digital sphygmomanometer to measure HBPM for seven consecutive days.

Results: The blood pressure values measured through the ABPM method were significantly lower than those measured by other methods (P<0.05). The prevalence of hypertension diagnosed by OBPM-Mercury, OBPM-Digital, HBPM, and ABPM method was 82%, 54%, 50%, and 21%, respectively. As compared with ABPM as the gold standard, the diagnostic accuracy of HBPM, OBPM-Digital, and OBPM-Mercury was 64%, 61%, and 32%, respectively. The frequency of white coat hypertension (WCH) diagnosed by HBPM and ABPM methods was 39% and 64%, respectively, and the frequency of masked hypertension (MH) diagnosed was 7% and 4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of HBPM, as compared with ABPM, in detecting MH were 100%, 96%, and 97%, respectively; in addition, as compared with WCH, they were 56%, 90%, and 68%, respectively.

Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed that HBPM had higher diagnostic accuracy than OBPM in diagnosing hypertension. Also, HBPM was able to detect MH with a high level of diagnostic accuracy, and in more than two-thirds of cases, it was also able to detect WCH and diagnose patients with sustained hypertension.



Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:

Our study showed that home blood pressure monitoring can be used with high diagnostic accuracy in hypertension detection, determining its phenotypes, and monitoring its treatment.

Please cite this paper as: Hajian S, Rastgoo N, Jamshidi S. Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of home blood pressure monitoring by patients. J Renal Inj Prev. 2021; 10(4): e31. doi: 10.34172/jrip.2021.31.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1625

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 940

Your browser does not support the canvas element.