Logo-jrip
Submitted: 09 Oct 2021
Accepted: 11 Feb 2022
ePublished: 09 Mar 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Renal Inj Prev. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/jrip.2022.31995
  Abstract View: 1684

Original

Furosemide stress test predicts acute kidney injury progression in intensive care unit

Srivatsava Jayakrishna Murthy ORCID logo, Lakshminarayana Venugopal, Varadharajan Jayaprakash ORCID logo, Raghavan Padmanabhan ORCID logo, Sailapathy Sreedhar* ORCID logo

1 SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, India
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding author: Prof. Sailapathy Sreedhar, Email: , Email: sreedhas@srmist.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical tools to predict acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care unit (ICU) are lacking.

Objectives: This prospective study was conducted to assess the utility of furosemide stress test (FST) to predict AKI and its progression to severe stages and requirement of hemodialysis (HD).

Patients and methods: Patients in AKI stage I or II were given a standardized dose of frusemide as per protocol. The study cohort included 62 patients. Response to FST was assessed by urine output (UOP) at 2 hours. Study patients were subsequently divided into two groups, those with UOP >200 mL (group A) and those with UOP <200 mL (group B).

Results: Group A constituted 71% (n=44) of cases. Of them, 2 (4.54%) patients progressed to AKI Network (AKIN) stage III. Group B constituted 29% of cases (n=18). Of them, 12 (66%) cases progressed to AKIN stage III. In group A, 4.5% (n=2) of cases required HD. In comparison, 55% (n=10) of group B patients required HD during the hospital stay. Mortality rate was 6.8% (n=3) in group A and 33.3% (n=6) in group B. The duration of stay was more in the patients with UOP <200 mL group compared to UOP >200 mL group.

Conclusion: FST may be a reliable predictor of AKI progression to severe stages and requirement of dialysis in ICUs.


Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:

Frusemide stress test can be used as a clinical tool to predict progression of acute kidney injury and dialysis requirement in intensive care settings.

Please cite this paper as: Jayakrishna Murthy S, Venugopal L, Jayaprakash V, Padmanabhan R, Sreedhar S . Furosemide stress test predicts acute kidney injury progression in intensive care unit. J Renal Inj Prev. 2022; 11(x): x-x. doi: 10.34172/jrip.2022.xx.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1685

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.