Logo-jrip
J Renal Inj Prev. 2026;15(2): e38718.
doi: 10.34172/jrip.2026.38718
  Abstract View: 4
  PDF Download: 4

Original

Protective effects of silymarin against favipiravir-induced renal injury in rats; a biochemical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical study

Bnar R. Abdalrahman 1 ORCID logo, Rebin Azad Omar 2 ORCID logo, Harem Kh. Awla 3 ORCID logo, Azheen S. Abdulrahman 3 ORCID logo, Lana S. Saleh 3 ORCID logo, Khder H. Rasul 3* ORCID logo

1 College of Nursing, University of Raparin, Rania, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region 46012, Iraq
2 Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Science and Health, Koya University, Koya 44023, Kurdistan Region - F.R. Iraq
3 Department of Biology, College of Science, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
*Corresponding Author: Khder H. Rasul, Email: Khder.rasul@su.edu.krd

Abstract

Introduction: Favipiravir, an antiviral agent widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic, has demonstrated therapeutic potential but has raised concerns regarding organ toxicity. Although its clinical benefits are well established, evidence of its nephrotoxic effects remains inconsistent.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the nephrotoxic effects of favipiravir and assess whether co-administration of silymarin could mitigate favipiravir-induced kidney injury.

Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 15 adult albino rats were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 5); group 1 received saline (control), group 2 was treated with favipiravir (1800 mg/kg on day one, followed by 800 mg/kg twice daily for 13 days), and group 3 received the same favipiravir regimen combined with silymarin (50 mg/kg twice daily). At the end of the 14-day treatment period, blood samples were collected to measure serum creatinine, blood urea, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. Kidneys were harvested for histopathological examination and immunohistochemical analysis using cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and paired box gene 8 (PAX8) markers.

Results: No significant differences were observed in serum creatinine, blood urea, or BUN among the groups. However, histopathological analysis revealed glomerular atrophy, coagulative necrosis, lymphocytic infiltration, and interstitial hemorrhage in the kidneys of favipiravir-treated rats. These changes were less severe in rats treated with silymarin. Immunohistochemical staining showed strong CK7 and PAX8 expression in favipiravir-treated rats, whereas both markers were absent in control and silymarin-treated groups.

Conclusion: Although favipiravir did not significantly alter kidney function parameters, histopathological findings indicate renal injury. The partial improvement observed in the silymarin-treated group suggests a potential nephroprotective effect, which warrants further investigation.


Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:

Favipiravir may cause renal injury that routine biochemical tests fail to detect; therefore, treatment guidelines and clinical practice should emphasize closer kidney monitoring, consider alternative or early injury biomarkers and acknowledge the potential nephroprotective role of agents such as silymarin.

Please cite this paper as: Abdalrahman BR, Omar RA, Awla HK, Abdulrahman AS, Saleh LS, Rasul KH. Protective effects of silymarin against favipiravir-induced renal injury in rats; a biochemical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical study. J Renal Inj Prev. 2026; 15(2): e38718. doi: 10.34172/jrip.2026.38718.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View:

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download:

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View:

Your browser does not support the canvas element.