Logo-jrip
ePublished: 09 Jul 2016
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Renal Inj Prev. 2016;5(3): 148-152.
doi: 10.15171/jrip.2016.31
PMID: 27689112
PMCID: PMC5040002
  Abstract View: 3811
  PDF Download: 2009

Original Article

Comparison of oral Lactobacillus and Streptococcus mutans between diabetic dialysis patients with non-diabetic dialysis patients and healthy people
 

Fahimeh Rezazadeh 1, Abdollah Bazargani 2, Jamshid Roozbeh-Shahroodi 3, Ali Pooladi 4, Peyman Arasteh 5,6*, Khosro Zamani 7

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Department of Bacteriology and Virology, Shiraz Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3 Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
4 Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
5 Non communicable Disease Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
6 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
7 Department of Bacteriology and Virology, Shiraz Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding author: Peyman Arasteh, , Email: peyman.arasteh@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes is associated with higher rates of caries, on the other hand some studies have shown that renal failure can be protective against dental caries.

Objectives: In this study we compared oral Lactobacillus and Streptococcus mutans between diabetic dialysis and non-diabetic dialysis patients and the normal population.

Patients and Methods: During November 2014 to January 2014, 85 people that referred to our medical care center entered the study. The sample included 30 diabetic dialysis, 28 non-diabetic dialysis patients and 27 healthy people. Oral saliva samples were obtained from their tongue and oral floor for microbiological examination. Patients’ data were compared before and after dialysis.

Results: The amount of Lactobacillus and S. mutans did not show a significant difference between the three groups (P=0.092 and P=0.966 for S. mutans and lactobacillus, respectively). A positive and meaningful correlation was seen between fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels and the amount of S. mutans in the diabetic dialysis group (P=0.023; r=0.413). A meaningful and positive correlation was also seen between the amount of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) after dialysis and the amount of oral S. mutans in the non-diabetic dialysis group (P=0.03; r=0.403).

Conclusion: Despite the differences in the prevalence of caries that have been reported between renal failure patients and diabetic patients, we did not find any significant difference between diabetic dialysis, non-diabetic dialysis patients and the healthy population, regarding their amount of oral cariogenic bacteria.

 

Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:

Diabetic dialysis patients tend to have a complex oral status and special attention should be given to their oral health.

Please cite this paper as: Rezazadeh F, Bazargani A, Roozbeh-Shahroodi J, Pooladi A, Arasteh P, Zamani K. Comparison of oral Lactobacillus and Streptococcus mutans between diabetic dialysis patients with non-diabetic dialysis patients and healthy people. J Renal Inj Prev. 2016;5(3):148-152. DOI: 10.15171/jrip.2016.31
Introduction:

 

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 3812

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 2009

Your browser does not support the canvas element.